Sponsored by
Stop overpaying for wireless. Get a Tello plan for under $25
Unlimited everything. No contract. Just $25/mo. With Tello, you get reliable 5G coverage, zero hidden fees, and none of the bundles you never wanted.
Not being able to find meaning can be just as powerful as finding meaning.
-Bret Easton Ellis
This one tends to land sideways the first time you read it. We're used to being told that meaning is the goal — find your purpose, know your why, everything gets easier once you've got the answer. Ellis is pointing at something less tidy: that the search itself, even when it comes up empty, does something to you that finding the answer never could.
He's not exactly known for comfort. His fiction spends most of its time in places where meaning has already collapsed — and maybe that's why the line carries weight instead of sounding like a poster. It's not written by someone who found their purpose and is now urging you toward the same discovery. It's written by someone who's stared at the absence for a long time and noticed the absence was doing something too.
What it's doing, most likely, is this: the not-knowing keeps you asking. A settled answer to "why am I doing this" tends to calcify — you stop examining it, stop testing whether it still holds. But genuinely not being able to land on an answer keeps the question alive. You keep circling it, keep noticing what you're drawn to and what you're not, keep paying attention in a way that certainty quietly lets you stop doing.
You can see a version of this play out in ordinary situations, not just existential ones:
The person who can't articulate why they love their work, and so keeps re-choosing it on its actual merits instead of running on autopilot toward a fixed identity.
The artist who makes something without knowing what it means, and trusts that the not-knowing is part of what makes it honest rather than illustrative.
The person between chapters of life — after a divorce, a move, a loss — who resists the pressure to narrate it into a lesson right away, and lets the disorientation itself do some of the work.
The reader who finishes a book with no clean takeaway and can't stop thinking about it, while the tidy, meaning-packaged book is forgotten by the following week.
None of this is an argument for staying lost on purpose, or romanticizing despair because it sounds profound. There's a real difference between a productive not-knowing that keeps you awake and searching, and a corrosive one that just hurts. Ellis's line isn't advice to stop looking. It's a reminder that the search isn't a waiting room you sit in until the real thing — meaning — finally shows up. The search is already doing something.
Where in your life are you treating "I haven't figured this out yet" as a failure, instead of as the thing that's actually keeping you honest?
Certainty is comfortable, but it's also where a lot of people quietly stop paying attention. The not-knowing is uncomfortable, but it's rarely wasted. Sometimes the most alive you'll be about something is the stretch where you still don't have it fully worked out.
Most of our readers also love these newsletters… See the list.
